社区问答

欢迎来到 Audiokinetic 社区问答论坛。在此,Wwise 和 Strata 用户可互帮互助。如需我们团队直接提供协助,请前往技术支持申请单页面。若要报告问题,请在 Audiokinetic Launcher 中选择“报告错误”选项(注意,问答论坛并不会接收错误报告)。我们内部设有专门的错误报告系统,会有专人查看报告并设法解决问题。

要想尽快得到满意的解答,请在提问时注意以下几点:

  • 描述尽量具体:比如,想达到什么样的目的,或者具体哪里有问题。
  • 包含关键细节:比如,Wwise 和游戏引擎版本以及所用操作系统等等。
  • 阐明所做努力:阐明自己为了排除故障都采取了哪些措施。
  • 聚焦问题本身:聚焦于问题本身的相关技术细节,以便别人可以快速找到解决方案。

0 投票

Our game is about to release the alpha test soon. However, I just learned from some sound designers that we should not uncheck the "listener relative routings" for all sounds except music . I checked it out on the documentation and it says  

Note

You should enable Listener Relative Routing on sounds and other objects of the Actor-Mixer Hierarchy even if they don't utilize 3D spatialization. Otherwise, their output busses will be associated with the emitter instead of the listener, resulting in distinct instances of busses.

 

I then profiled the game and noticed that it does have multiple instances (one primary, one for music, and one for non-Listener relative routing sounds, 3 in total) of master busses. It seems be a serious problem (at least the master limiter is dublicated and is not expected to work correctly) but the QA team have never reported a bug caused by this.

 

May I ask if this will cause some unacceptable bugs that are not yet found?

 

Also, at the current stage, our game (UE4) has some sounds that must be unchecked the "listener relative routings". For example, sounds that play before a listener is created, sounds that will be blocked by volumes, sounds played in the "Unreal Global", and a few movable actors that will cause unexpected high cpu usage when interact with spatial volumes. Is there a principle method to deal with those issues?

分类:General Discussion | 用户: Zhuolun Z. (930 分)

Please sign-in or register to answer this question.

...