コミュニティQ&A

Audiokineticのコミュニティ主導のQ&Aフォーラムへようこそ。ここはWwiseとStrataのユーザのみなさまがお互いに協力し合う場です。弊社チームによる直接のサポートをご希望の場合はサポートチケットページをご利用ください。バグを報告するには、Audiokinetic LauncherのBug Reportオプションをご利用ください。(Q&AフォーラムではBug Reportを受け付けておりませんのでご注意ください。専用のBug Reportシステムをご利用いただくことで、バグの報告が適切な担当部門に届き、修正される可能性が高まります。)

最適な回答を迅速に得られるよう、ご質問を投稿される際は以下のヒントをご参考ください。

  • 具体的に示す:何を達成したいのか、またはどんな問題に直面しているのかを具体的に示してください。
  • 重要な詳細情報を含める:Wwiseとゲームエンジンのバージョンやご利用のOSなど詳細情報を記載してください。
  • 試したことを説明する:すでに試してみたトラブルシューティングの手順を教えてください。
  • 事実に焦点を当てる:問題の技術的な事実を記載してください。問題に焦点を当てることで、ほかのユーザのみなさまが解決策を迅速に見つけやすくなります。

+10 支持

Hello! 

I tried to update a project from Wwise 2022.1.1 to 2023.1.0 / 2023.1.2 and found that performance in Spatial Audio on the same test cases became worse specifically on Portal Path Validation.

 

I made a simple isolated test case as well in UE5: 20 box shapes rooms 10x10x10 meters, each with 1 portal inside. All the rooms located close to each other (~1-2 meters a distance between walls) and spread in 5 columns, 4 rows. There're no emitters besides of the player footsteps. Each rooms has triangles enabled, acoustic texture is default, diffraction is enabled. The settings of spatial initialization are:

  • max propagation path = 4
  • movement threshold = 100
  • number of primary rays = 30
  • reflection order = 1
  • diffraction order = 4
  • max emitter room aux send = 1
  •  diffraction on reflection = 0
  • max path length = 10000
  • CPU limit = 20
  • load balancing = 2
  • enabled geometric diffraction / transmission = true
  • calc emitter virtual pos = true

This test case always gives me ~30-40 % of CPU on portal path validation, especially when player moves behind all the rooms, therefore more geometric diffraction happens there. 

The same test scenario works perfectrly with small amount of portal path validation CPU numbers (~0.02%) in Wwise 2021.1.1.

 

While profiling with external profiler I found that there's the most consumption on CAkStocjasticReflectionEngine::ComputePaths. I tried to disable reflections completely to see what will happen (reflection order = 0), but that suddenly made situation worse — with the reflection order of 1 the most consumption was when player's moving, but with 0 reflections it's a constant load on the portal path validation CPU with the same numbers. Also profiler still shows CAkStocjasticReflectionEngine::ComputePaths as working (with bigger numbers).

 

I'm wondering is that some bug there? Or if not are there any tips to make such test case working the same way as in the previous versions?

 

Thanks, 

Alexey

Alexey O. (230 ポイント) General Discussion
Hello, same here. Did you by chance find any workarounds?
Having the same issue here. Thought this had been fixed in an update but this test still seems to give me some pretty high values even after updating to Wwise 2023.1.10. With an array of 64 rooms and only 1 sound playing my cpu goes up to 100%

回答 1

0 支持
Hi,

We had the same issue on Unreal 5.5 and 2023.1.10 fixed it. But other parameters may cause CPU excessive loads:

- Try increasing Load Balancing Spread

- Try reducing Max Sound Propagation Depth, depending on your project you won't need that much

- Try reducing Maximum Path Length

- Basically try messing around with Spatial Audio Settings values and check in the profiler

- We also implemented a system that deactivates all portals that are not in a radius within the player. This also depends on your project of course but in our case, it's also helpful to control how many Portals are needed and enabled.
Florent Dumas (150 ポイント)
Same with 2024.1.3
...