Community Q&A

Welcome to Audiokinetic’s community-driven Q&A forum. This is the place where Wwise and Strata users help each other out. For direct help from our team, please use the Support Tickets page. To report a bug, use the Bug Report option in the Audiokinetic Launcher. (Note that Bug Reports submitted to the Q&A forum will be rejected. Using our dedicated Bug Report system ensures your report is seen by the right people and has the best chance of being fixed.)

To get the best answers quickly, follow these tips when posting a question:

  • Be Specific: What are you trying to achieve, or what specific issue are you running into?
  • Include Key Details: Include details like your Wwise and game engine versions, operating system, etc.
  • Explain What You've Tried: Let others know what troubleshooting steps you've already taken.
  • Focus on the Facts: Describe the technical facts of your issue. Focusing on the problem helps others find a solution quickly.

0 votes
When organizing objects in the Project Explorer > Audio tab hierarchies, I prefer to use Actor-Mixers instead of Virtual Folders because it allows me to have hierarchical control over the children (overall volume control, default output bus, default RTPC behavior, etc.). Whenever I see people using Virtual Folders, I recommend they use Actor-Mixers instead. Here's my question: In what circumstances are a Virtual Folder preferable over an Actor-Mixer? I can't think of any situation in which I'd want to use a Virtual Folder.
in General Discussion by Ian S. (2.1k points)

1 Answer

+1 vote
An Actor-Mixer will take a tiny bit of runtime memory vs. virtual folders that are not packaged in the SoundBanks. We're really talking about a few bytes per Actor-Mixer, so nothing to care about 99.x% of the time. The workflow benefit during development usually outweigh the runtime consideration.  

Simon
by Simon A. (Audiokinetic) (3.6k points)
Aha! Thank you!
...